Reflections on the Principle of Expediency in administrative litigation law and criminal law
Mots-clés :
principle of expediency; principle of proportionality; principle of fairnessRésumé
The authors analyze the principle of discretion from the perspectives of both criminal law and administrative litigation law. The paper reflects on how the principle of discretion should be applied, based on the principles of good faith and equity. The authors aim to emphasize the importance of applying the principle of expediency in accordance with the principles of proportionality, good faith, and, last but not least, the fairness of the measure ordered.
Références
Saramet Oana, Spirchez Georgeta Bianca, “On the Usefulness of Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Analyzing Exceeding the Limits of the Administration’s Discretionary Power,” Studia Iurisprudentia 3, 2018.
Civil Judgment No. 383/2024 of the Olt Tribunal.
Judgment No. 88/2023: Failure to provide grounds for the decision rejecting the plaintiff’s request to remain in his public office beyond the standard retirement age. Annulment of the decision ordering the termination of employment.
Constitutional Court Decision No. 12/2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, No. 198 of March 11, 2020.
Constitutional Court Decision No. 757/2017.
Government Decision No. 390/2025 adopting the Strategy for the Development of the Judicial System and Justice as a Public Service 2025–2029 and its corresponding action plan, dated April 16, 2025.
Decision No. 15/2019 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice (HCCJ) – Appeal in the Interest of the Law.
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Merci de créditer les auteurs lors de toute citation : Oana Roxana Ionescu, Anca Diana Artene (2026)

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.