Patent Enforcement: A Comparative Review Preventing Patent Trolling in Europe

Auteur/ices

  • Benjamin FRANCO Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
  • Cristian BANACU Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.35219/mms.2018.3.09

Mots-clés :

patent trolls, US patent laws, intellectual property, differences between EU and US laws on Intellectual PropertyNon-Practicing Entities, Intellectual PropertyNon-Practicing Entities in Europe and the United States

Résumé

The US has made significant progress in the patent legislation landscape as evidenced by the US Patent Act in the Constitution and America Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. Nevertheless, patent suits by non-practicing entities (NPEs) have been on the increase over the past ten years. Major corporations, especially, such as Apple and Samsung have been on the receiving end of the litigation as NPEs target their large cash holdings. A closer look at the patent laws in the US and Europe reveals subtle differences in the grace period, publication of patent, and the application of patent rights across member states. Given the preceding facts, vital action points for the European market include the enactment of laws that prevent patent trolls as opposed to punishing NPEs after the act and reduction of litigation costs for lowquality patents.

Creative Commons License

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2018-09-15

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Comment citer

1.
Patent Enforcement: A Comparative Review Preventing Patent Trolling in Europe. Ann_UGAL_MMS [Internet]. 15 sept. 2018 [cité 2 nov. 2026];41(3):57-62. Disponible sur: https://ojs.ugal.ro/index.php/mms/article/view/1761

Articles les plus lus par le ou les mêmes auteur/ices