Neuro-Rights - History, General Overview, and the Connection with Transhumanism and Emerging Technologies
Keywords:
neuro-rights; neurotechnology; cognitive autonomy; mental privacy; human rights; artificial intelligence; brain-computer interfaces; transhumanism; neural data protection; human dignityAbstract
The paper analyzes the concept of neuro-rights in the context of the accelerated development of neurotechnologies and their convergence with artificial intelligence. Starting from the theoretical grounding of the notion and its recent evolution in the specialized literature, the study highlights the need to expand the framework of fundamental human rights to include the protection of brain activity, mental privacy, and cognitive autonomy. The main risks generated by brain-computer interfaces, neural implants, AI systems capable of interpreting EEG or fMRI signals, as well as augmented and virtual reality technologies are examined, with particular emphasis on vulnerabilities related to mental surveillance, cognitive manipulation, and algorithmic discrimination. The article presents the five fundamental neuro-rights proposed by the NeuroRights Initiative - mental privacy, personal identity, cognitive autonomy, equitable access to neurotechnology, and protection against algorithmic bias - and correlates them with existing international legal instruments (UDHR, ECHR, the Oviedo Convention). It also analyzes the constitutional precedent of the Republic of Chile (2021), which explicitly recognized the protection of brain activity, as well as the recommendations formulated by UNESCO, the OECD, and the WHO. Finally, the paper highlights the connection between neuro-rights and transhumanism, showing that the legal regulation of interventions on the brain is becoming essential for safeguarding human dignity and preventing new forms of cognitive inequality. Neuro-rights are presented as a necessary and preventive extension of fundamental rights, intended to ensure the protection of the individual in the face of the technological transformations of the twenty-first century
References
Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30(Supplement), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_30_supplement3
Congreso Nacional de Chile. (2021). Reforma constitucional que modifica el artículo 19 de la Constitución Política de la República incorporando los neuroderechos. Boletín N° 13.828-19. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1163622
Consiliul Europei. (1997). Convenția privind drepturile omului și biomedicina (Convenția de la Oviedo) .https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/oviedo-convention
Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Wiley-Blackwell.
Neuralink. (2024). Updates on our first human implant. https://neuralink.com/blog/first-human-implant-update/
NeuroRights Initiative. (n.d.). The five neuro-rights. Columbia University. https://neurorightsfoundation.org
OECD. (2019). Recommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology. https://www.oecd.org/science/recommendation-on-responsible-innovation-in-neurotechnology.htm
Shen, G., Horikawa, T., Majima, K., & Kamitani, Y. (2019). Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(1), e1006633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006633
Terec-Vlad, L. (2025). Mituri, arhetipuri și simboluri în transumanism. Pro Universitaria.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
Yuste, R., & Goering, S. (2021). Neurotechnologies, human rights, and the future of humanity. Health and Human Rights Journal, 23(1), 49–59.
Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A. Y., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., Kellmeyer, P., … & Wolpaw, J. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loredana Terec-Vlad, Ciprian Gabriel Ungureanu, Andreea Buruiana (Rusu)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.